Varied Techniques for carpet cleaning Hair Removal

Hair is this kind of emotive subject and with human nature being human nature, what we want we can’t have and what we have we don’t want! Frizzy hair and we want straight, straight hair and we want curly, brunette and we want blonde, blonde and we want red. Likewise upper lip hair on a female, so valued as an indicator of exquisite beauty in certain parts of the world, is vilified by our Western society.

Unwanted hair is really a common problem affecting the majority of women to varying degrees throughout their lives and prompting the use of various temporary methods of hair reduction or hair management systems. It causes great distress, and it is often followed by feelings of poor self-confidence, an expression of isolation and low self worth.

Since the instances when bearded women in Victorian travelling fairs were displayed for entertainment and ridicule, Western society has nurtured a stigma about excess hair. Many women are pressured into tremendous lengths to eliminate any trace of hair from any and every part of the body as they feel it to be unattractive and unappealing. However it is not only women that are now affected… increasingly the male gender is susceptible to pressure from the ‘fashion’ and celebrity world and unwanted hair could be in the same way vilified by the male population nowadays as the female.

Different Methods of Hair Removal

Superfluous hair growth could be due to many factors, such as, hormone imbalance, (during puberty, pregnancy and menopause), genetics and ethnicity, hereditary, medication or topical stimulation e.g. waxing or tweezing. Therefore, electrolysis – the only permanent method of hair removal, is a treatment that’s in great demand by female and transsexual clients and recently, as a result of society’s attitudes, how many male clients is increasing.

To meet this need there as always been many hair removal measures some which return centuries in history. Hair removal has been around since caveman times but interestingly the parts of the human body we’re removing hair from have differed on the ages. Removing hair from the head and face of men was originally not for vanity purposes but also for survival. There’s evidence that cavemen did this but also the ancient Egyptians and it absolutely was undertaken, we imagine, for protection, as scraping off the beard and hair on the head would remove the main advantage of an adversary having anything to grab onto in addition to having less mites!

In ancient Egypt, Greece, and Middle Eastern countries, removing body hair was important. Actually these women removed most of the body hair, with the exception of eyebrows. Egyptian women removed their head hair and pubic hair was considered uncivilized by both sexes! It had been also considered uncivilized for men to own hair on their face. Facial hair was the mark of a slave or servant, or of a person of lower class. The ancient Egyptians used an application of razors made of flint or bronze as the razor was not invented till the 1760’s by French barber, Jean Jacques Perret.

They also used a technique of temporary hair removal called sugaring. A sticky paste (bees wax was sometimes used) will be put on skin, a reel of cloth was pressed onto the wax and yanked off – very same of waxing today. Wealthy women of the Roman Empire would remove their body hair with pumice stones, razors, tweezing and pastes. There is also another technique used called threading which can be recently seeing a resurgence in popularity. Thin string or yarn will be placed through the fingers of both of your hands, and quickly stroked on the area. This repetitive process captured the hair and effectively tweezed, ripped or pulled the unwanted hair out. During the Elizabethan times the practice of hair removal, (not of leg, armpit or pubic hair), of the eyebrows and the hair from their foreheads to be able to give the look of a lengthier brow and forehead was fashionable. It’s startling to note the most obvious influence ‘fashion’ has played in hair removal from the very beginning.

Waxing, sugaring, depilatory creams, bleaching, shaving, sugaring, plucking, threading and even battery-powered tweezers multiple-plucking systems, are temporary methods that lots of people try today. Actually new hair removal devices seem to seem like buses – every 20 minutes approximately! However, technology has moved on and with it, it appears there are some restricted and doubtful methods of hair removal. X-ray and photodynamic methods come in a restricted category as the former has been banned in some countries such as the USA and the latter are only in experimental stages. Electric tweezers, transdermal electrolysis, and microwaves are some of the doubtful methods in that there surely is no established data on their effectiveness.

Electrolysis is still the only proven permanent method of hair removal and many women and indeed many men, have benefited from this tried and trusted treatment. It’s often the case that electrologists are privileged to witness a remarkable transformation within their clients, from a shy, introverted personality at the beginning of a program of treatments, to a confident and happy individual once treatment is underway and results become apparent.

Whatever your opinion of hair, ‘removing it’ inside our Western society is a multiple million pound industry. This kind of huge money making machine though can have more than its fair share of misconceptions, misunderstandings, myths and legends none which relate much to the hard reality truth. The huge profit led hair removal industry has its fair share of charlatans and scams all attracted by the huge profit led opportunities.

Hair Removal methods are generally permanent and temporary. The English dictionary definition of ‘permanent’ states: perpetual, everlasting. With this specific at heart there is just one system available on the market today that could totally prove ‘permanent’ hair removal primarily because of its longevity, client testimony and satisfaction and that’s electrolysis. Invented in 1875 electrolysis offers permanent removal of hair for all hair types and colours and all skin types and colours. It remains utilised in hospitals by surgeons and ophthalmologists for trichaisis and other distortions of the eyelashes as well supporting the hospital laser hair removal departments. It can be considered an important tool in the work of veterinary surgeons for animals (primarily horses and dogs) for the permanent removal of distorted and in-growing eyelashes. It provides cosmetic relief for the consumer with mild hirsute problems to the in-patient with seriously hirsute problems and for the transgender patient who may require many hours of treatment.

Apparently there has been confusing messages from the regulatory bodies on definitions of what the words ‘permanent’, ‘removal’ or ‘reduction’ in the hair removal industry actually mean. Agreement was reached that if the hairs which were removed don’t grow back for an amount of twelve months after the final treatment, permanent reduction could be claimed. Electrolysis, invented in 1875 remains even today, the one method legally allowed to claim ‘permanent removal’ ;.

The newer technologies such as LASER (Light Amplification Stimulated Emission of Radiation) and IPL (Intense Pulse Light) were initially launched as competitors of electrolysis and initially marketed as THE answer for all permanent hair removal. This, it is now realised, reaches best, somewhat nave and at worst, certainly misleading. The reality is that this is wishful thinking and nowadays ‘claims’ tend to be more realistic. The truth is that whilst they have their successes they also have their limitations – they cannot treat all hair colours and types and all skin colours successfully and they now accept their limitations and embrace electrolysis and electrologists as their back up.

Laser and IPL are allowed by the FDA to claim permanent ‘reduction’ although not permanent ‘removal’ of hair. The truth is that newer technology is brilliant for large areas and for dark hair. For grey or white hair it really simply doesn’t work. Laser and IPL target the melanin in the hair and if the hair is grey or white there is no melanin remaining in the hair because of it to target. In addition to this, for unknown reason(s) not all the hair reacts to treatment and results vary from 85% – 95% success. The rest of the 5% – 15% hair will undoubtedly be stripped of its melanin (thus appearing white) but still stubbornly continues to grow. This then leaves the only option of ‘permanent hair removal’ down to additional electrolysis treatment to accomplish the job. Laser and IPL are now recognised to be a hair ‘management’ system and clients are advised that regrowth may occur.

Photoepilator light energy was launched in 1969 and was developed from research into laser hair removal. Photoepilators make use of a burst of filtered light directed at one hair at a time. Following the focus of the light, the hair is tweezed. Like any laser and light 激光脫毛優惠 instrument, the light used in the device is targeted contrary to the blood and melanin pigments in the hair and heats them up. Allow this method, fibre-optic probes were inserted to the hair follicle through which the light was flashed. There’s no clinical data published to date to support any permanency claims and there is no established data on its effectiveness.

The tweezer method with its unsubstantiated claim of ‘permanent hair removal’ was initially patented in 1959. This method functions by passing an household current through the tweezers, which holds the hair on the surface of skin by grasping them for a number of minutes. Electricity enters through the hair to its root and claims to permanently damage it. The scientific community has reservations as the claim of electricity destroying the root of the hair has no scientific backup.

Transcutaneous and Transdermal offers ‘permanent Hair Removal’ but no clinical data has been published currently to establish the declare that permanent hair removal is possible using these methods. In 1985 when the use of AC electric tweezers was stopped, the manufacturers made some modifications in the apparatus. Adhesive patches rather than cotton swabs were introduced and a title change into transcutaneous hair removal. It uses the idea of direct current (DC) for transdermal delivery of drugs (iontophoresis) without the use of a needle. A DC household current is passed by way of a conductive gel on the surface of skin via an adhesive patch added to the skin. The hair root is claimed to be damaged permanently by the household current that travels down to the hair follicle.

To date no clinical data can be obtained and the laws of physics don’t support the claims created by the manufacturers. Hair does not conduct electricity but skin does. As electricity passes through the medium of poor resistance, it’ll spread along the outer lining of skin as opposed to passing through the hair. Therefore, just like the tweezer method, the argument that it will reach the root of the hair to destroy it has no scientific backup.

Ultrasound hair removal claims that ultrasound waves are channelled precisely down the hair shaft and in the act they transform to thermal energy that super heats the hair growth areas and inhibits regrowth. It’s stated that the waves are bound to the hair shaft and don’t dissipate into skin prevents any side effects.

Ultrasound hair removal offers ‘total hair removal’ and claims to function as the ‘next generation of long haul hair removal devices’ ;.It states in its marketing material it is ‘The hair removal solution’ and that ‘no additional hair appears in the exact same follicle proving that this is a long-term treatment’ ;.The FDA has not given the results currently regarding a credit card applicatoin to promote in April 2010 of the latest device.

Hair is this kind of emotive subject and with human nature being human nature, what we want we can’t have and what we have we don’t want! Frizzy hair and we want straight, straight hair and we want curly, brunette and we want blonde, blonde and we want red. Likewise upper lip hair on a…

Hair is this kind of emotive subject and with human nature being human nature, what we want we can’t have and what we have we don’t want! Frizzy hair and we want straight, straight hair and we want curly, brunette and we want blonde, blonde and we want red. Likewise upper lip hair on a…